Adjunctive heat-clearing Chinese patent
medicines for pediatric acute upper respiratory tract infection: A network
meta-analysis
Abstract: Background:
Oral heat-clearing and detoxifying Chinese patent medicines (CPMs) are
frequently added to conventional therapy for pediatric acute upper respiratory
tract infection (AURTI), but comparative evidence among products is sparse. Objectives: To compare adjunctive oral
CPMs, prioritizing time to fever resolution and to assess total effective rate,
cough resolution and adverse events. Methods:
Eight databases and grey-literature sources were searched from inception to 31
May 2026. Eighteen studies were synthesized qualitatively; ten studies
contributed to quantitative analyses. Two loop-enabling trials were added: One
head-to-head comparison of Xiaoer Chiqiao Qingre Granules (CQ) with Lianhua
Qingwen Granules (LHQW) and one LHQW-plus-conventional-therapy comparison.
Loop-specific direct-versus-indirect inconsistency was assessed. Results: The CT-CQ-LHQW triangle formed
one closed loop. No statistically detectable inconsistency was found for total
effective rate (inconsistency factor 1.06, 95% CI 0.86-1.31; P=0.583) or
adverse events (0.13, 95% CI 0.003-5.27; P=0.283), although the safety interval
was very wide. The consistency-model RRs versus conventional therapy were 1.24
(95% CI 1.12-1.38) for LHQW and 1.18 (95% CI 1.07-1.32) for CQ. Pairwise
analyses favored adjunctive CPMs for fever and cough resolution, with
substantial heterogeneity. Conclusion:
A real closed loop permits a limited consistency check, but certainty remains
very low because only one loop was available, safety events were sparse and
clinical and outcome definitions varied. Product rankings remain exploratory. Registration: The review was not prospectively registered. Funding:
None.









